What You Can Actually Negotiate in an Employment Agreement
Most people only negotiate salary. Here are the employment agreement terms that are often negotiable — and how to approach them.
What You Can Actually Negotiate in an Employment Agreement
Most people negotiate salary. Some negotiate equity. Almost nobody negotiates the employment agreement. That's leaving real value on the table, because several provisions in a standard employment agreement are meaningfully negotiable — and knowing which ones to focus on is the first step.
What Most People Miss Beyond Salary
The offer letter gets negotiated. The employment agreement gets signed.
This is the pattern at most tech companies, and it means that most employees are leaving non-salary value on the table. The non-compete scope, the IP assignment carve-outs, the stock option exercise window, the signing bonus clawback structure — these are provisions that affect what you own, what you can do next, and how much of your compensation you actually keep. They're also, in the right circumstances, negotiable.
The key is knowing which provisions are genuinely negotiable at your level, which requests are reasonable, and how to raise them without derailing the offer process. Here's a focused breakdown.
Non-Compete: Scope Is Negotiable
The existence of a non-compete may or may not be negotiable depending on the company and your state. But the scope almost always is.
A standard non-compete often restricts working at "any company that competes with the employer's business." For a company with multiple lines of business — cloud, advertising, hardware, services — this could cover a huge swath of the tech industry. That breadth is often not intentional; it's just how the template was written.
What to ask for: narrow the restricted activity to your specific function. If you're a machine learning engineer, ask for the restriction to cover "direct competitors in the machine learning infrastructure space" rather than all of the employer's business lines. If you're a product manager for a consumer product, the restriction probably shouldn't cover the company's enterprise or cloud businesses.
How to frame the ask: "I want to make sure I understand the scope of the non-compete. Could we clarify that this covers my specific area of work rather than all of the company's business lines?" This reads as a clarification question, not a challenge to the provision.
IP Assignment: The Prior Inventions Carve-Out
The prior inventions schedule is the built-in mechanism for protecting personal IP. But for employees with significant prior work — a startup project in development, open-source tools with commercial applications, or a patent application — a generic schedule entry may not be enough.
What to ask for: a specific named exclusion in the body of the PIIA, not just in the schedule exhibit. Something like: "[Project Name], as further described in Exhibit A, is expressly excluded from the assignment provisions of this Agreement." This creates redundant protection and makes the exclusion harder to overlook or dispute.
You can also ask for a carve-out for a defined category of personal work — "personal software projects developed on personal time using personal equipment that are unrelated to the Company's primary business" — as a belt-and-suspenders protection alongside the prior inventions schedule.
Stock Option Exercise Windows
The 90-day post-termination exercise window is standard. It's also genuinely harmful to employees at startups and pre-IPO companies, as described in our post on stock options. And unlike most employment agreement terms, it is increasingly negotiable — particularly at senior levels and at companies that have adopted progressive policies.
What to ask for: an extended post-termination exercise window, typically 1-5 years or the life of the option (10 years from grant). The ask is: "Could we extend the exercise window to [X years] after termination?" Most startups can grant this administratively; it costs very little.
If the company says no, ask what the policy is — some companies grant extensions on a case-by-case basis at board discretion, which may be the effective answer.
Check your employment agreement for free
Paste your employment agreement into Dott and get an AI-powered risk analysis in 30 seconds. No signup required.
Analyze My AgreementClawback Provisions: The One Change Worth Asking For
If your offer includes a signing bonus, there's almost certainly a clawback provision. The single most valuable change to ask for: exclude involuntary termination without cause from the clawback trigger.
The typical clawback provision triggers repayment on any departure within the window — including if you're laid off. The ask is simple: "I'd like to request that the signing bonus clawback not apply if I'm terminated without cause or laid off." This is reasonable, protects you from the double hardship of losing your job and owing money, and costs the company very little — they're not planning to lay you off.
The other ask worth making: pro-rata repayment instead of full repayment. If the window is 24 months and you've worked for 18 of them, owing 25% of the bonus is more equitable than owing 100%.
What's Not Negotiable (And Why)
Some provisions are genuinely not negotiable at most companies, and spending negotiating capital on them is counterproductive:
At-will employment: At-will is the default rule in almost all US states, and companies are not going to contract around it for individual contributors. This is not negotiable.
Mandatory arbitration clause: Large companies have standardized arbitration agreements that apply to all employees. Negotiating an exception at the individual employee level is extremely rare. You can ask, but don't be surprised when the answer is no.
Basic confidentiality provisions: The employer's right to protect its trade secrets and confidential information is not negotiable. What you can sometimes negotiate is the scope (see: overbroad definitions) and the duration for non-trade-secret information.
Standard vesting schedule: The cliff date and vesting frequency for RSU grants are generally standardized across levels at large companies. Individual exceptions require approval at levels above HR and are rare.
Non-compete existence in states where they're common: If you're in Washington state, the employer is not waiving the non-compete entirely. But the scope (as discussed above) may be negotiable.
How to Raise Negotiation Requests
A few practical notes on process:
- Frame as clarification first: "I want to make sure I understand this provision correctly" is a less confrontational opening than "I'd like to change this."
- Make written requests: Verbal requests are easy to lose track of. Follow up in writing (email is fine).
- Time them appropriately: Raise these before you sign the offer letter if possible, or alongside any other negotiation. Don't raise them on day one.
- Know when to accept: Some of these will be no. That's fine. Getting the signing bonus clawback language right and the exercise window extended is a good outcome even if the non-compete scope negotiation doesn't succeed.
The Bottom Line
Employment agreements contain negotiable terms beyond salary that most engineers don't explore. Before you sign, paste your agreement into dott.legal for a free AI risk analysis that flags the clauses most worth addressing — including non-compete scope, IP assignment breadth, and clawback triggers. For situations where you want attorney support in structuring specific negotiation requests, attorney-validated review is $349 with 24-hour turnaround.
Want a personalized analysis?
For important agreements — senior roles, significant equity, aggressive non-competes, or severance packages — get a Deep Analysis ($29) personalized to your state, industry, and role, or a full Attorney-Validated Review ($349) with specific contract edits and a professional legal memo.